![]() At the aft the Torpedo bulge on the Eugen goes to ~ half of the barrel of the No.4 turret. While the reduction percentage is identical, the area covered isn't. But it is identical! I can hear you thinking. Moving away from the armor we get the Torpedo Protection. I haven't really noticed the extra 10mm saving me but for the protocol I have mentioned them. This could theoretically make Yamato shells bounce, theoretically. While the Belt armor is still thin the Eugen has a 40mm citadel slope compared to Hipper's 30mm. And again to make it precise I mean the citadel slopes. Directly from the front the section still is small and I haven't yet noticed how this section has killed my in a situation where the Hipper would've just laughed. A small, yet noticable section at the waterline remains at only 25mm making bow on citadels more likely than on the Hipper. While the bow armor of both ships is stronger than on any other Cruiser at their Tier, the Eugen does not have the 40mm plate extended until the front of the bow. ![]() This gives the turrets on the Eugen a small kick in survivability. 4 turrets where the slope facing forward has 105mm, the side slopes have 80mm and the rear and deck armor has 70mm. On the Eugen we have an armor scheme similar to the No. On the Hipper the roof armor has a 70mm thickness at any point. To make it precise the roof armor of the No. ![]() I've only had one game where these few points made a difference, but in the end that difference allowed me to deal 8k more damage so it can help you, but it's situational.įirst on our list is the turret armor. Starting off is the one where we have a variety of factors which all play a role, some more than others.Įasiest one is the Hitpool and it goes without saying that the Eugen surpasses the Hipper with 1,200 points.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |